
根据凯撒家庭基金会(KFF)近期的一项调查,美国雇主和员工正面临数年来最为陡峭的医保成本涨幅。2025年家庭平均保费已逼近26993美元,且2026年保费涨幅或更为陡峭。
短期来看,医疗成本将再度转嫁给员工,GLP-1类高价药物的承保范围将收紧,围绕价格上涨的政策辩论也将愈发激烈——然而,目前尚未出现明确且可推广的解决方案。
保费新常态
医疗研究机构凯撒家庭基金会发布的雇主调查显示,2025年家庭平均保费上涨约6%至26993美元,其中员工个人需承担约6850美元。据《纽约时报》报道,雇主指出,处方药、慢性病及医疗服务使用率上升是推动成本增长的主要因素。过去五年,保费累计涨幅约达26%;初步数据显示,若缺乏有效的成本控制措施,2026年恐将延续这一上涨趋势。
保费加速上涨并非仅局限于雇主市场。更全面的分析表明,各细分领域成本均呈上升态势。若保险方案设计调整无法抵消这一潜在趋势,2026年的保费涨幅或将创下十余年来的新高。在未出台新限制措施的情况下,雇主预计涨幅将接近9%,这将加剧福利预算和家庭财务压力。
成本攀升的原因
多重因素共同作用:医院价格上涨、医疗服务提供者的人力成本通胀持续,以及疫情期间推迟的医疗需求恢复导致服务使用率上升。高价药物支出占比持续攀升,包括用于减肥及心血管代谢风险干预的GLP-1类药物——2025年多数雇主为这类药物提供保险覆盖,但随着预算收紧,未来可能会限制承保范围。
医疗体系整合使其在定价谈判中的话语权显著增强,远程医疗普及推高了服务使用率,尤其是在行为健康领域。雇主还指出,专科药房扩张与供应链压力形成的成本叠加效应,是难以通过传统福利调整化解的。
雇主的应对困境
凯撒家庭基金会首席执行官德鲁·奥尔特曼(Drew Altman)认为,企业现有的应对手段——从缩小网络范围、直接签约到健康管理、价格透明化和慢性病护理计划——仅带来渐进式改善,原因在于雇主不愿推行可能引发员工反对的变革举措。在医疗服务提供者话语权集中的碎片化体系中,当保费飙升时,提高免赔额和费用分摊比例仍是首选的“快速节省成本”手段。
由于缺乏新调控手段,GLP-1类药物需求激增与医院价格上涨已敲响“无声警钟”,奥尔特曼警告称,2026年极有可能再度出现成本转嫁的情况,雇主或会缩减减重药物承保范围或加强管控。他还指出,近期联邦政府开支削减并未解决核心价格问题,雇主与家庭仍将承受保费持续攀升带来的压力。
员工承担代价
专家警告称,即便按计划推行削减举措,2026年仍可能出现自2010年以来最为显著的福利成本跃升。雇主正加速调整保险方案,将更多成本转嫁给员工。调查显示,超半数企业计划提高免赔额、自付限额或重新调整方案以遏制成本上涨态势。员工应预期工资扣除额增加6%-7%,且药品目录会愈发严格。
雇主正加大对药房合同和GLP-1类药物承保情况的审查力度,许多企业在投资心理健康服务可及性、“高效网络”以引导患者选择低成本高质量服务商的同时,也在探索通过更严苛的资格审核、材料证明和网络限制来控制支出。这些举措或可缓解成本上升趋势,但难以从根本上扭转这一趋势。
补贴到期
凯撒家庭基金会的简报指出,随着保费压力加剧,成本控制可能成为美国政府的重要议程,但在解决价格问题(尤其是医院和药品成本)上,各方仍难以达成共识。各州已启动医院成本增长上限政策试点工作,但全国性框架缺乏协调性和议价能力,短期内仍难以扭转趋势。
其他市场联邦补贴到期或调整可能加重消费者负担。凯撒家庭基金会估算显示,增强型保费税收抵免政策若终止,明年市场平均保费支出将翻一倍有余,这表明可负担性对政策框架极为敏感。尽管这与雇主市场无直接关联,却凸显了价格上涨对家庭的影响。
2026年展望
预计保费涨幅将再次超过工资涨幅,雇主将依赖更严苛的保险方案设计,提高员工成本分摊比例,并加强对GLP-1类等专科药物的管理。若医院价格、专科药房支出和服务使用率等核心驱动因素依旧居高不下,雇主下一步可能会缩小网络范围、增加直接签约,但行业动荡风险将限制此类举措的大规模推行。
若整个医疗体系缺乏更严格的价格管控,最可能的走向将是:医疗成本持续攀升、成本再次转嫁给员工、部分福利缩减。这些因素叠加将考验员工的支付能力、挤压小企业的利润空间,并使医疗通胀问题持续成为董事会的重点议题。
《财富》杂志使用生成式人工智能完成初稿,经编辑核实信息准确性后发布。(*)
译者:中慧言-王芳
根据凯撒家庭基金会(KFF)近期的一项调查,美国雇主和员工正面临数年来最为陡峭的医保成本涨幅。2025年家庭平均保费已逼近26993美元,且2026年保费涨幅或更为陡峭。
短期来看,医疗成本将再度转嫁给员工,GLP-1类高价药物的承保范围将收紧,围绕价格上涨的政策辩论也将愈发激烈——然而,目前尚未出现明确且可推广的解决方案。
保费新常态
医疗研究机构凯撒家庭基金会发布的雇主调查显示,2025年家庭平均保费上涨约6%至26993美元,其中员工个人需承担约6850美元。据《纽约时报》报道,雇主指出,处方药、慢性病及医疗服务使用率上升是推动成本增长的主要因素。过去五年,保费累计涨幅约达26%;初步数据显示,若缺乏有效的成本控制措施,2026年恐将延续这一上涨趋势。
保费加速上涨并非仅局限于雇主市场。更全面的分析表明,各细分领域成本均呈上升态势。若保险方案设计调整无法抵消这一潜在趋势,2026年的保费涨幅或将创下十余年来的新高。在未出台新限制措施的情况下,雇主预计涨幅将接近9%,这将加剧福利预算和家庭财务压力。
成本攀升的原因
多重因素共同作用:医院价格上涨、医疗服务提供者的人力成本通胀持续,以及疫情期间推迟的医疗需求恢复导致服务使用率上升。高价药物支出占比持续攀升,包括用于减肥及心血管代谢风险干预的GLP-1类药物——2025年多数雇主为这类药物提供保险覆盖,但随着预算收紧,未来可能会限制承保范围。
医疗体系整合使其在定价谈判中的话语权显著增强,远程医疗普及推高了服务使用率,尤其是在行为健康领域。雇主还指出,专科药房扩张与供应链压力形成的成本叠加效应,是难以通过传统福利调整化解的。
雇主的应对困境
凯撒家庭基金会首席执行官德鲁·奥尔特曼(Drew Altman)认为,企业现有的应对手段——从缩小网络范围、直接签约到健康管理、价格透明化和慢性病护理计划——仅带来渐进式改善,原因在于雇主不愿推行可能引发员工反对的变革举措。在医疗服务提供者话语权集中的碎片化体系中,当保费飙升时,提高免赔额和费用分摊比例仍是首选的“快速节省成本”手段。
由于缺乏新调控手段,GLP-1类药物需求激增与医院价格上涨已敲响“无声警钟”,奥尔特曼警告称,2026年极有可能再度出现成本转嫁的情况,雇主或会缩减减重药物承保范围或加强管控。他还指出,近期联邦政府开支削减并未解决核心价格问题,雇主与家庭仍将承受保费持续攀升带来的压力。
员工承担代价
专家警告称,即便按计划推行削减举措,2026年仍可能出现自2010年以来最为显著的福利成本跃升。雇主正加速调整保险方案,将更多成本转嫁给员工。调查显示,超半数企业计划提高免赔额、自付限额或重新调整方案以遏制成本上涨态势。员工应预期工资扣除额增加6%-7%,且药品目录会愈发严格。
雇主正加大对药房合同和GLP-1类药物承保情况的审查力度,许多企业在投资心理健康服务可及性、“高效网络”以引导患者选择低成本高质量服务商的同时,也在探索通过更严苛的资格审核、材料证明和网络限制来控制支出。这些举措或可缓解成本上升趋势,但难以从根本上扭转这一趋势。
补贴到期
凯撒家庭基金会的简报指出,随着保费压力加剧,成本控制可能成为美国政府的重要议程,但在解决价格问题(尤其是医院和药品成本)上,各方仍难以达成共识。各州已启动医院成本增长上限政策试点工作,但全国性框架缺乏协调性和议价能力,短期内仍难以扭转趋势。
其他市场联邦补贴到期或调整可能加重消费者负担。凯撒家庭基金会估算显示,增强型保费税收抵免政策若终止,明年市场平均保费支出将翻一倍有余,这表明可负担性对政策框架极为敏感。尽管这与雇主市场无直接关联,却凸显了价格上涨对家庭的影响。
2026年展望
预计保费涨幅将再次超过工资涨幅,雇主将依赖更严苛的保险方案设计,提高员工成本分摊比例,并加强对GLP-1类等专科药物的管理。若医院价格、专科药房支出和服务使用率等核心驱动因素依旧居高不下,雇主下一步可能会缩小网络范围、增加直接签约,但行业动荡风险将限制此类举措的大规模推行。
若整个医疗体系缺乏更严格的价格管控,最可能的走向将是:医疗成本持续攀升、成本再次转嫁给员工、部分福利缩减。这些因素叠加将考验员工的支付能力、挤压小企业的利润空间,并使医疗通胀问题持续成为董事会的重点议题。
《财富》杂志使用生成式人工智能完成初稿,经编辑核实信息准确性后发布。(*)
译者:中慧言-王芳
U.S. employers and workers are being squeezed by the steepest run-up in health insurance costs in years, with average family premiums nearing $26,993 in 2025 and pressure building for even sharper increases in 2026, according to a recent KFF survey.
The near-term outlook points to renewed cost shifting to employees, tighter coverage for pricey drugs like GLP 1s, and a louder policy debate over price growth—without an obvious, scalable fix in sight.
The new premium reality
KFF, a health research group, released an employer survey showing average family premiums rose about 6% in 2025 to roughly $26,993, with workers contributing about $6,850 toward the total. Employers cite prescription drugs, chronic disease, and elevated utilization as the leading cost drivers, according to a New York Times report of the survey. The five-year increase now totals approximately 26%, and preliminary indicators suggest another upward trend in 2026, absent meaningful cost containment.
Premium acceleration is not confined to the employer market; broader analyses point to rising costs across segments, with expectations that 2026 will bring the sharpest increases in over a decade if plan design changes don’t offset underlying trend. Employers are bracing for hikes approaching 9% in the absence of new limits, reinforcing the strain on benefits budgets and household finances.
Why costs are climbing
Several forces are converging: higher hospital prices, persistent inflation in provider labor, and heavier use of services as care deferred during the pandemic comes back online. A growing share of spending is tied to high cost drugs, including GLP 1s for weight loss and cardiometabolic risks, which many employers covered in 2025 but may curb as budgets tighten.
Consolidation among health systems has strengthened negotiating leverage on rates, while improved access via virtual care has increased utilization, especially in behavioral health. Employers also flag specialty pharmacy growth and supply chain pressures, creating a cost stack that traditional benefit tweaks struggle to unwind.
Employers’ strained playbook
KFF’s CEO Drew Altman argues that corporate tools—from narrow networks and direct contracting to wellness, transparency, and chronic-care programs—have delivered only incremental gains because employers avoid pushing changes that trigger employee backlash. In a fragmented system with concentrated provider power, the go-to “quick savings” lever remains higher deductibles and cost-sharing when premiums spike.
With few new levers and a “quiet alarm bell” over GLP 1 demand and hospital price increases, Altman warns of a likely return to cost shifting in 2026 and potential pullbacks or tighter management of weight loss drug coverage. He also notes that recent federal spending cuts do little to address underlying prices, leaving employers and families exposed to continued premium growth.
Workers pay the price
Experts warn that 2026 could bring the most significant benefit-cost jump since 2010, even after planned reductions, as employers accelerate plan changes that shift more costs to workers. In surveys, more than half of companies expect to raise deductibles, out-of-pocket maximums, or otherwise redesign plans to temper the trend. Employees should expect 6%–7% increases in paycheck deductions and tighter formularies.
Employers are increasingly scrutinizing pharmacy contracts and GLP 1 coverage, with many exploring stricter eligibility, documentation, and network limitations to control spend, even as they invest in mental health access and “high performance” networks to steer care to lower cost, higher quality providers. These moves may blunt, but not reverse, the underlying cost trajectory.
Expiring subsidies
KFF’s briefing flags cost containment could become a bigger agenda item in D.C. as premium pressures intensify, but consensus on tackling prices—particularly hospital and drug costs—remains elusive. State experiments in hospital cost growth caps are emerging, yet the national framework lacks the alignment and bargaining power to bend trend in the near term.
Expiring or changing federal subsidies in other markets could steepen consumer exposure, with KFF estimating that lapsing enhanced premium tax credits would more than double average marketplace premium payments next year—evidence of how sensitive affordability is to policy scaffolding. While not directly the employer market, it highlights the stakes of price growth for households.
The 2026 outlook
Expect premium growth to outpace wage gains again, with employers leaning on tighter plan designs, higher employee cost shares, and closer management of specialty drugs such as GLP 1s. If underlying drivers—provider prices, specialty pharmacy, and utilization—remain elevated, the next wave of employer responses could extend to narrower networks and more direct contracting, but disruption risk will limit scale.
Absent stronger price discipline at the system level, the most probable path is another year of elevated increases, renewed cost shifting, and selective benefit retrenchment—which together will test worker affordability, squeeze margins for smaller firms, and keep healthcare inflation a boardroom priority.
For this story, Fortune used generative AI to help with an initial draft. An editor verified the accuracy of the information before publishing.
 
			