
尽管伊朗和以色列仍在互射导弹,冲突短期内似乎难以结束,但原油价格在上周末大幅飙升之后,于周一小幅下跌,这或许令人意外。
美国原油基准价格6月16日徘徊在每桶71美元左右,接近年初水平,但较一周前上涨约9%。当前油价被认为是一个相对健康的水平——能让大多数石油生产商盈利,又不会导致燃料价格过高。
因此,尽管以色列上周末成功袭击了伊朗部分石油和天然气基础设施,石油市场却保持了相对平静。而伊朗尽管目前处于相对劣势,据报道该国也表现出与美国重启核谈判的意愿。
为什么呢?以下是对这种情况的四点解读:
尽管以色列轰炸了油气设施和油田,但伊朗的石油出口基础设施无一受损
以色列袭击了伊朗的南帕尔斯天然气田、沙赫兰燃料库和沙赫雷伊炼油厂,但这些目标均服务于国内燃料和电力消费,而非全球出口。这导致伊朗国内出现燃料抢购和潜在的短缺,但对全球石油市场以及伊朗每日约150万桶的原油出口影响甚微。
能源预测专家、Pickering Energy Partners咨询研究公司创始人兼首席投资官丹·皮克林表示:“各方都在刻意避开石油[出口]基础设施,因为这会让局势显著复杂化和升级。以色列不想这么做,我认为伊朗也不想。”
另一方面,皮克林对《财富》杂志表示:“只需一枚误炸的炸弹就可能引发问题。一旦人们丧失理性,局势就会迅速失控。”
皮克林指出,这就是结果区间如此巨大的原因:若局势平息,油价可能跌至每桶55美元(这个低价会损害石油生产商的利润);若战争升级且欧佩克整体产量受影响,油价则可能升至每桶120美元左右。
伊朗毗邻霍尔木兹海峡,每天有约2,000万桶石油通过这条相对狭窄的水道出口,约占全球石油消费量的五分之一。这些石油流动受到影响将改变一切。
需要明确的是,每桶120美元或更高的油价对几乎所有人都不利,因为燃料成本飙升将引发全球范围内的广泛需求崩溃。
以色列袭击伊朗的两个月前,由沙特领导的欧佩克及其盟友意外宣布增产
这个所谓的欧佩克+组织提高了月度配额,目标是到今年年底将日产量增加逾200万桶,从而扭转多年来的自我限产。
虽然该决定未必预见到伊朗与以色列的冲突,但欧佩克的举措确实让特朗普总统在美伊核谈判中拥有了更多筹码。
皮克林在评论欧佩克行动时表示:“如果说在当前的局势中有什么可称为‘高明’,那就是欧佩克在应对中东风险时相对精妙的布局。产量的恢复似乎精准填补了伊朗的出口量,因此此举可能更多是针对[通过制裁]减少伊朗出口,而非针对冲突。”
XTB经纪公司研究总监凯瑟琳·布鲁克斯强调了特朗普希望维持低油价的意图,并指出白宫实际上可能对市场产生“安抚效应”。
布鲁克斯补充道:“相反,我们认为美国的介入可能使[以色列]对伊朗的袭击范围缩小至核设施。此前以色列称其情报显示伊朗拥有足够制造九枚原子弹的铀。”
美国燃料价格在未来几天将会上涨,但如果能避免局势升级,涨幅应该不大且可能是短暂的
然而,任何持久战都会改变这一局面。
GasBuddy石油分析主管帕特里克·德哈恩表示:“随着以色列和伊朗互相攻击,油价已飙升至数月高点,为全国加油站进一步涨价埋下了伏笔。只要中东紧张局势持续升级,油价进一步受影响的风险仍然很高。”
德哈恩预计,未来每加仑燃料价格可能上涨10至20美分。“驾车者应为目前可能出现的适度涨价做好准备,但局势随时可能恶化。”
根据GasBuddy的数据,截至6月16日上午,上周全美每加仑汽油平均价格上涨了1.1美分,均价为每加仑3.08美元。然而,当前全美平均价格较一个月前下降了9.5美分,较一年前下降了32.7美分。
正如皮克林所说:“[伊朗]确实在黑名单上,但其受到的制裁并未被特别严厉地执行,因为全世界都在高度关注油价及其对通胀和经济的影响。发达国家已认定,廉价的汽油价格比真正惩罚不良行为者更重要。”
目前的较高油价不太可能引发美国油气生产商改变行动
即使去年油价略高于当前水平时,美国石油钻探商也表现出了克制和资本纪律,并没有“拼命钻井、大干快上”这样的心态。
皮克林表示:“波动性巨大,欧佩克在增加供应,而且伊朗是否会减少供应也存在不确定性。所以,何必贸然增加投机性资本支出呢?或许一个月后醒来,我们会发现油价又回到了55美元。”
那么,从能源角度应如何看待中东局势?
皮克林总结道:“这场冲突可能产生重大影响,因此人们应予以关注。目前看来,它像是一场带来潜在短暂价格飙升的麻烦。情况可能变得更糟,所以请密切关注,并祈祷局势不会升级。”(*)
译者:刘进龙
审校:汪皓
尽管伊朗和以色列仍在互射导弹,冲突短期内似乎难以结束,但原油价格在上周末大幅飙升之后,于周一小幅下跌,这或许令人意外。
美国原油基准价格6月16日徘徊在每桶71美元左右,接近年初水平,但较一周前上涨约9%。当前油价被认为是一个相对健康的水平——能让大多数石油生产商盈利,又不会导致燃料价格过高。
因此,尽管以色列上周末成功袭击了伊朗部分石油和天然气基础设施,石油市场却保持了相对平静。而伊朗尽管目前处于相对劣势,据报道该国也表现出与美国重启核谈判的意愿。
为什么呢?以下是对这种情况的四点解读:
尽管以色列轰炸了油气设施和油田,但伊朗的石油出口基础设施无一受损
以色列袭击了伊朗的南帕尔斯天然气田、沙赫兰燃料库和沙赫雷伊炼油厂,但这些目标均服务于国内燃料和电力消费,而非全球出口。这导致伊朗国内出现燃料抢购和潜在的短缺,但对全球石油市场以及伊朗每日约150万桶的原油出口影响甚微。
能源预测专家、Pickering Energy Partners咨询研究公司创始人兼首席投资官丹·皮克林表示:“各方都在刻意避开石油[出口]基础设施,因为这会让局势显著复杂化和升级。以色列不想这么做,我认为伊朗也不想。”
另一方面,皮克林对《财富》杂志表示:“只需一枚误炸的炸弹就可能引发问题。一旦人们丧失理性,局势就会迅速失控。”
皮克林指出,这就是结果区间如此巨大的原因:若局势平息,油价可能跌至每桶55美元(这个低价会损害石油生产商的利润);若战争升级且欧佩克整体产量受影响,油价则可能升至每桶120美元左右。
伊朗毗邻霍尔木兹海峡,每天有约2,000万桶石油通过这条相对狭窄的水道出口,约占全球石油消费量的五分之一。这些石油流动受到影响将改变一切。
需要明确的是,每桶120美元或更高的油价对几乎所有人都不利,因为燃料成本飙升将引发全球范围内的广泛需求崩溃。
以色列袭击伊朗的两个月前,由沙特领导的欧佩克及其盟友意外宣布增产
这个所谓的欧佩克+组织提高了月度配额,目标是到今年年底将日产量增加逾200万桶,从而扭转多年来的自我限产。
虽然该决定未必预见到伊朗与以色列的冲突,但欧佩克的举措确实让特朗普总统在美伊核谈判中拥有了更多筹码。
皮克林在评论欧佩克行动时表示:“如果说在当前的局势中有什么可称为‘高明’,那就是欧佩克在应对中东风险时相对精妙的布局。产量的恢复似乎精准填补了伊朗的出口量,因此此举可能更多是针对[通过制裁]减少伊朗出口,而非针对冲突。”
XTB经纪公司研究总监凯瑟琳·布鲁克斯强调了特朗普希望维持低油价的意图,并指出白宫实际上可能对市场产生“安抚效应”。
布鲁克斯补充道:“相反,我们认为美国的介入可能使[以色列]对伊朗的袭击范围缩小至核设施。此前以色列称其情报显示伊朗拥有足够制造九枚原子弹的铀。”
美国燃料价格在未来几天将会上涨,但如果能避免局势升级,涨幅应该不大且可能是短暂的
然而,任何持久战都会改变这一局面。
GasBuddy石油分析主管帕特里克·德哈恩表示:“随着以色列和伊朗互相攻击,油价已飙升至数月高点,为全国加油站进一步涨价埋下了伏笔。只要中东紧张局势持续升级,油价进一步受影响的风险仍然很高。”
德哈恩预计,未来每加仑燃料价格可能上涨10至20美分。“驾车者应为目前可能出现的适度涨价做好准备,但局势随时可能恶化。”
根据GasBuddy的数据,截至6月16日上午,上周全美每加仑汽油平均价格上涨了1.1美分,均价为每加仑3.08美元。然而,当前全美平均价格较一个月前下降了9.5美分,较一年前下降了32.7美分。
正如皮克林所说:“[伊朗]确实在黑名单上,但其受到的制裁并未被特别严厉地执行,因为全世界都在高度关注油价及其对通胀和经济的影响。发达国家已认定,廉价的汽油价格比真正惩罚不良行为者更重要。”
目前的较高油价不太可能引发美国油气生产商改变行动
即使去年油价略高于当前水平时,美国石油钻探商也表现出了克制和资本纪律,并没有“拼命钻井、大干快上”这样的心态。
皮克林表示:“波动性巨大,欧佩克在增加供应,而且伊朗是否会减少供应也存在不确定性。所以,何必贸然增加投机性资本支出呢?或许一个月后醒来,我们会发现油价又回到了55美元。”
那么,从能源角度应如何看待中东局势?
皮克林总结道:“这场冲突可能产生重大影响,因此人们应予以关注。目前看来,它像是一场带来潜在短暂价格飙升的麻烦。情况可能变得更糟,所以请密切关注,并祈祷局势不会升级。”(*)
译者:刘进龙
审校:汪皓
Crude oil prices, maybe surprisingly, dipped modestly on Monday after spiking at the end of last week, even as Iran and Israel continue firing missiles at each other with no easy end in sight.
The U.S. oil benchmark hovered around $71 per barrel on June 16—about where it started the year—but up roughly 9% from a week prior. The current price tag is considered a relatively healthy value—profitable for most oil producers without creating particularly high fuel prices.
So, even though Israel successfully targeted some of Iran’s oil and gas infrastructure over the weekend, oil markets have stayed relatively calm, and Iran, which is not in a position of strength, is reportedly signaling its interest in returning to nuclear negotiations with the U.S.
Why? Here are four takeaways:
Even though Israel bombed oil and gas facilities and fields, notably, none of Iran’s oil-exporting infrastructure was touched.
Israel struck Iran’s South Pars gas field, the Shahran fuel depot, and the Shahr Rey oil refinery, but all of these targets are for domestic fuel and power consumption, and not global exports. That contributed to a run on fuel and potential shortages within Iran, but it has much less impact on global oil markets and Iran’s roughly 1.5 million barrels per day of crude oil exports.
“Everybody is taking a hands-off approach to oil [exporting] infrastructure because it meaningfully complicates and escalates the situation,” said energy forecaster Dan Pickering, founder and chief and investment officer for Pickering Energy Partners consulting and research firm. “Israel doesn’t want to do that, and I don’t think Iran does either.”
On the other hand, Pickering told Fortune. “You’re one stray bomb away from a problem. If you get to a point where people stop acting rationally, things get crazy quickly.”
That’s why the range of outcomes is vast from $55 per barrel oil if things calm down—a low price that hurts the bottom lines of oil producers—up to $120 or so if war escalates and overall OPEC production is impacted, Pickering said.
Iran sits next to the Strait of Hormuz, and the exports through that relatively narrow body of water account for about 20 million barrels daily, or one-fifth of global consumption. Impacting those flows changes everything.
To be clear, oil at or above $120 per barrel is bad for almost everyone because skyrocketing fuel costs would trigger widespread demand destruction around the world.
Israel’s attack on Iran comes two months after Saudi Arabia-led OPEC and its allies surprisingly announced production increases.
The so-called OPEC+ group increased their monthly quotas, essentially aiming to grow production by more than 2 million barrels daily by the end of the year, and undoing years of self-imposed curtailments.
While the decision didn’t necessarily anticipate a conflict in Iran, the OPEC’s move did give President Trump more leverage in the U.S. nuclear negotiations with Iran.
“If anything in this situation could be called elegant, it is a relatively elegant set up when dealing with the risk of problems in the Middle East,” Pickering said of OPEC’s moves. “It looks like the return of production pretty closely mirrors Iran’s exports, and so it was probably more geared toward a reduction of exports [through sanctions] as opposed to a conflict.”
Kathleen Brooks, research director the the XTB brokerage house, highlighted how Trump wants to keep oil and fuel prices low, and that the White House could actually have a “calming effect” on markets.
“Instead, we think that U.S. involvement could see the [Israeli] attacks on Iran narrow to nuclear sites, after Israel said that it gathered intelligence that Iran had enough uranium to make nine atomic bombs,” Brooks added.
U.S. fuel prices will rise in the days ahead, but the spikes should prove modest and potentially short-lived if escalations are avoided.
However, the math is changed with any prolonged war.
“With Israel and Iran trading attacks, oil prices have surged to multi-month highs—setting the stage for additional price hikes at gas pumps across the country,” said Patrick De Haan, head of petroleum analysis at GasBuddy. “As long as tensions in the Middle East continue to escalate, the risk of further impacts on oil prices remains high.”
De Haan projects fuel prices could rise by 10 to 20 cents per gallon moving forward. “Motorists should prepare for what will likely be modest price increases—for now—but the situation has the potential to worsen at any moment.”
Thus far, the national average price of gasoline has risen 1.1 cents per gallon in the last week, averaging $3.08 per gallon as of the morning of June 16, according to GasBuddy. However, the national average is down 9.5 cents from a month ago and 32.7 cents lower than a year ago.
As Pickering said, “[Iran] is on the naughty list, but their sanctions haven’t been particularly aggressively applied because the world is so focused on oil prices and the impact on inflation and economies. The developed world has decided that cheap gasoline prices are better than truly punishing bad actors.”
The higher-for-now oil prices are unlikely to trigger any changes in the actions of U.S. oil and gas producers.
U.S. oil drillers were showing restraint and capital discipline—and not the ‘drill, baby, drill’ mentality—last year even when prices were a bit higher than today.
“The volatility is dramatic, OPEC is adding supply, and it’s not a given that Iran is going to reduce supply,” Pickering said. “So, why step up and spend capital speculatively when we could wake up in a month and oil is back to $55?”
So, how should everything in the Middle East be viewed from the energy perspective?
“This is a conflict that could have meaningful impacts, so people should be paying attention,” Pickering concluded. “Right now, it looks like an inconvenience with a potentially temporary price spike. It could become much worse, so pay attention and cross your fingers it doesn’t escalate.”